OoooOOoo I like this article!

Bible has some shocking ‘family values’

By Michael Coogan, Special to CNN
October 26, 2010 12:53 p.m. EDT
  • Michael Coogan: Bible seen as unassailable divine authority, but it was written by men, not God
  • Written over course of 1,000 years, each writer reflecting values of his day, he writes
  • Much in Bible rejected: Slavery, women as property, pork as abomination, Coogan says
  • Coogan: Bible’s true timeless message is equal, even loving, treatment of all people

Editor’s note: Michael Coogan is a lecturer on Hebrew Bible-Old Testament at Harvard Divinity School, professor of religious studies at Stonehill College, and director of publications for the Harvard Semitic Museum. Editor of “The New Oxford Annotated Bible,” his most recent book is “God and Sex: What the Bible Really Says” (Twelve).

(CNN) — When talking about so-called family values, pastors, popes, and politicians routinely quote the Bible as if it were an unassailable divine authority — after all, they assume, God wrote the Bible, and therefore it is absolutely and literally true.

But that is a misconception. As the Bible itself makes clear, its authors were human beings, many of whom are named: David, Isaiah, Luke, and Paul. These human writers wrote over the course of more than a thousand years, and their writings reflect their own views and the values they shared with their contemporaries. So it’s not surprising that inconsistencies are frequent in the Bible, both trivial and profound.

Although Jews and Christians, individually and collectively, have for the last 2,000 years accepted the Bible as authoritative in principle, in practice many of its values have been rejected. On issues such as slavery, no one today would maintain that slavery is acceptable, even though, according to the Bible, it was a divinely sanctioned institution. In the debates about slavery in the 19th century those opposed to its abolition cited the Bible in support of their position, but despite such biblical warrant, their views were renounced.

According to biblical law, a father could sell his daughter as a slave, and the last of the Ten Commandments lists as off-limits a neighbor’s possessions — his house, wife, slaves, and livestock. But the majority of modern Jews and Christians no longer accept the biblical view of women as men’s property and hence subordinate to them, as they have also abandoned the biblical practice of polygamy.

According to biblical law, a father could sell his daughter as a slave.
–Michael Coogan

In current debates about family values, most of which have to do with sex, opponents of abortion and advocates of a woman’s right to choose both cite the Bible in support of their conflicting views, even though the Bible in fact says nothing specifically about the issue. And with regard to same-sex marriage, although the few biblical writers who mention same-sex relationships, especially between men, were unequivocally opposed to them, many contemporary believers would argue that, as with slavery and the status of women, it is time to recognize that the values of the biblical writers are no longer necessarily our own.

Opponents of same-sex marriage cite Leviticus, which says that when a man sleeps with a man as with a woman it is an abomination. They’re right: It does say that. But it later calls for the death penalty for such activity, which only the most rabid opponents would insist on. The Bible also calls eating pork and a woman wearing a man’s clothes abominations, yet many would no longer enforce such prohibitions.

Individual biblical texts should not be appealed to selectively: Such cherry-picking is all too easy because of the nature of the Bible as a multi-authored book. Rather, as with another formative text, the Constitution, one needs first to understand it historically — what did its words mean when they were written — and then attempt to determine what its underlying values are, not just what it says in a specific passage. Only in this sense can the Bible be considered to have timeless relevance that transcends the historical particularities of its authors.

What are those underlying values? I would argue that they are rooted in love of neighbor, which Jewish and Christian commentators over the ages have identified as the essential and enduring message of the Bible.

Here are three of them. The great Rabbi Hillel, who when asked what the basic principle of the Torah was, replied: “What is hateful to you do not do to your neighbor: That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary.” His words are echoed both by his near-contemporary, another rabbi, Jesus of Nazareth, who put it this way: “Whatever you wish people to do to you, so you should do to them: for this is the Law and the Prophets,” and by an early leader in the movement that Jesus started, the rabbinically trained Paul, who pronounced that “Love is the fulfilling of the law.”

So, I suggest, the essence of the Bible — its ultimate authority — is not in its individual pronouncements, but in its underlying message: equal, even loving, treatment of all persons, regardless of their age, gender, socio-economic status, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.

The opinions in this commentary are solely those of Michael Coogan.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to OoooOOoo I like this article!

  1. amyhftw says:

    The Rabbi Hillel quote sums up my entire Biblical philosophy. The story goes, he was approached by some non-believers/pagans/what have you and they said, “If you can stand on one leg and recite the Torah, we will convert.” That’s when he said it.

    True or not, I love that story.

  2. Kzinti says:

    So, women aren’t property any more? Because that will make my personal property taxes a lot less this year not having to claim my wife and daughter as chattel.

  3. GOF says:

    There have been at least 3 translations of the Bible in my lifetime.
    The Lord’s Prayer today reads totally differently to me when I compare it to the version current during my childhood.

    My mind boggles at just how any original scripture might have been changed, perverted, re-arranged for political convenience, or otherwise tampered with in all the centuries before Mama of GOF landed me on the planet.

    • Lauri says:

      And yet I will talk to people who claim every word….every silly, human, petty, conflicting word is God’s word.

      But, you know what? I am feeling that I am getting past the phase where this bothers me. I’m getting to where I really feel that people are what they are.

      Gee, maybe I’m growing up. 😛

  4. Snowy says:

    If you’re going to cherry pick what you want to believe and what you don’t want to believe, then the Bible has lost any authority it might have had as the supposed word of God. Time to move on from the ramblings of other men down through the ages, I think. One shouldn’t need the threat of eternal damnation in order to practise the golden rule, anyway.

  5. capnstephel says:

    Oooo…me too! Nice find!

  6. Hello..I agree with what Snowy said in his comment..I also believe that any words or views about God come from man..I believe the question to be..’Where did man come from..and what are his capabilities?’..just knowing the historic origin and permissions from Rome about the ‘King James edition of the bible’ an eye opener..It is a wonderful book..the metaphor and histories find compatibility in many time frames through all known times..since Christ there is not a time it does not exist..’In the ‘cutting edge of my philosophy..which admitedly is theory..I say..’when man understands his capacity to create artistically..he may come to understand the God’s he created’ 🙂 Peace Tony

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s